Posted by: chartroose | April 15, 2008

Charity Girl

Michael Lowenthal, 2007, 317 p.

I wasn’t all that impressed with Charity Girl, which is too bad because it had such potential.  It could have been a great story, but I think that somewhere in the midst of developing the plot and characters, Mr. Lowenthal lost his way.

Now, I don’t want to be too ugly about this; Charity Girl has some good points.  The setting(s) are particularly fine.  Lowenthal’s imagery of Boston during World War I — the architecture, the atmosphere, the mood of the patriotic hordes seem to be just about perfect.  His descriptions of some of the events that took place during that time pulled me right into the story.  I enjoyed reading about parades, dance halls, and a Red Sox game starring Babe Ruth.  I enjoyed reading about the movies and cars and other extraneous details of life at that time.  That was all good.

What I didn’t like, and I mean absolutely didn’t like, was the main character, Frieda Mintz.  She was just plain dumb.  From start to finish, I had to keep reciting the following litany over and over again: “she’s only 17 and it’s a different time, she’s only 17 and it’s a different time…” because Frieda was a total moron.  The only sensible things she did during the entire novel were to run away from an oppressive home and become a shopgirl.  If she weren’t such a dimwit, she could eventually make her way in the world, but noooo, she has to have sex with an utterly unappealing egotistical soldier who treats her like crap and gives her syphilis.  She remains infatuated with this useless man until the end of the novel when he denounces her and she finally gets a clue about what a pig he really is.  Duh!

I think some male writers are bad at writing women.  I’ve run into this time and time again.  Perhaps Mr. Lowenthal is one of those guys who have problems writing about the wimmenfolk.  I suspect that he really struggled with Frieda and with some of the other female characters as well.  After Frieda was picked-up for having syphilis, she was incarcerated in a kind of halfway house with a group of prostitutes and other infected “charity girls” like herself.  I had a terrible time keeping some of the characters straight.  After awhile, I began telling myself that they were “Flopsy, Mopsy, Cottontail and Peter.”  (No, not Peter — “peter” was what got them thrown in there in the first place)!

Also, the book was boring, and it shouldn’t have been.  Mr. Lowenthal had a wonderful idea for a dramatic tear-jerker of a novel and just frittered it away, interspersing moments of melodrama with the mind-numbing minutiae of life in the “home for bad gurrls.”

Even though I wasn’t enjoying myself, I had to finish the book to see what happened.  It ended the way I expected it to, so then I felt like an idiot for wasting my time.  Hey, I’m no smarter than Frieda Mintz!  I should be put in a “home” too!

The premise of the novel is fascinating.  This really happened to young women during World War I.  Upwards of 30,000 infected women were detained in these group homes, and around half of the detainees were sent sent to real prisons upon recovery in order to protect our soldiers from their immoral clutches.  How disgraceful!  This was before women had the right to vote or virtually any basic rights at all.  It’s too bad Charity Girl didn’t focus more on the socio-political ramifications of this bloodless coup against women.  A broader scope would’ve done it a world of good.


  1. The premise is a good one…it’s too bad the book didn’t live up to it. A moronic main character can completely spoil a book.

    Also, I didn’t know that had happened…wow. Exploring the socio-political side of that would have really been interesting.

  2. You’re right, Nymeth. It seems like I’m running into more and more novels that have really stupid or unappealing characters. Frieda didn’t have any redeeeming qualities, other than being pretty (and that doesn’t mean crap to me). That’s why I thought Lowenthal doesn’t know how to write women.

    If I want to think about ‘ho’s with borderline IQ’s, all I have to do is look up from my desk at work ( : I don’t want to have to read about them too!

  3. I haven’t read this book, but it definitely sounds like a bad case of “dumb heroine syndrome.” In the past, when I come across a truly moronic main character, I would always read through, just to see what would happen. Nowadays, I just abandon the book because I just can’t stand watching them do one stupid thing after another. Have you ever read any V.C Andrews novels? That series has the poster child for heroines severely lacking in gray matter. I wonder how Frieda would measure up to them.

  4. Hey, you’re absolutely right about “dumb heroine syndrome” TY! I never really thought about it that way, but I’ve read quite a few books featuring these imbecilic women. And yes, Frieda would fit right in with them.

    “Flowers in the Attic” creeped me out. The kids seemed like they belonged in “Children of the Corn,” all blank and blonde and brainless. And the incest, oh hell no! Did that need to be in there too? Didn’t the girl have a baby too? EEEW!

  5. Fascinating

  6. I also had no idea about this part of American history – how interesting. And definitely makes for a great premise of a novel. Its too bad the book didn’t live up to its potential for you, that can be so frustrating.

  7. My book club is discussing this book today. It will be interesting to see if they have a similiar take as expressed here. I wanted to dump it umpteen times but didn’t for we’ve agreed to read the recommended book for the month. I admit that I didn’t know about these detention camps.

  8. […] Bloody Hell, It’s a Book Barrage! […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: